End-to-end story validation should see
Business EventProduction, invoice, maintenance, FX, IC, journal, or actuals event occurs.
Driver ChangesDriver Ontology resolves production, price, volume, utilization, headcount, capex, or maintenance impact.
Forecast ChangesForecast Intelligence refreshes revenue, cash, EBITDA, margin, and confidence.
Accounting ImpactFinancial Event Fabric and Continuous Close Engine identify accrual, journal, reconciliation, or IC impact.
Control ValidationPolicy Runtime validates materiality, authority, SoD, evidence, and embedded controls.
Journal AutomationBlackLine/SAP path drafts or validates journal and reconciliation action.
Close Readiness UpdateContinuous Close recalculates readiness, blockers, owner, and critical path.
CFO InsightVariance/Narrative agents explain what changed, why, what happens next, and what to do.
Agent inventory required for validation
| Agent | Priority | Demo | Purpose |
|---|
| Financial Event Agent | P1 | Yes | Converts operational events into financial signals and impact triggers. |
| Driver Intelligence Agent | P1 | Yes | Maps operational driver movement to financial outcomes. |
| Forecast Agent | P1 | Yes | Refreshes forecast, confidence, and financial impact. |
| Variance Agent | P1 | Yes | Explains plan/forecast/actual variance with driver attribution. |
| Journal Agent | P1 | Yes | Scores journal risk and recommends approval or escalation. |
| Accrual Agent | P1 | Yes | Finds missing accruals and drafts evidence-backed recommendations. |
| Intercompany Agent | P1 | Yes | Matches, explains, and recommends IC resolution. |
| Evidence Agent | P1 | Yes | Assembles evidence packs, lineage, and replay proof. |
| Close Agent | P1 | Yes | Computes close readiness and critical path blockers. |
| Policy Agent | P1 | Yes | Evaluates rules, authority, controls, and action boundaries. |
| Narrative Agent | P2 | Yes | Produces management commentary from evidence and drivers. |
| Capitalization Agent | P1 | Yes | Determines expense vs capitalize and AUC readiness. |
| AUC Monitoring Agent | P1 | Yes | Monitors aged AUC, completion signals, contamination, and impairment risk. |
| Asset Completion Agent | P1 | Yes | Detects technical completion and readiness to capitalize. |
| Fixed Asset Policy Agent | P1 | Yes | Applies fixed asset policy, materiality, precedent, and SoX controls. |
| SoX Evidence Agent | P1 | Yes | Assembles control evidence for capitalization and reporting decisions. |
| Allocation Driver Agent | P1 | Yes | Validates allocation and recharge drivers. |
| PaPM Lineage Agent | P1 | Yes | Explains formula, version, source driver, output, and posting target. |
| Recharge Variance Agent | P1 | Yes | Explains bill-to-actual breaks and recommends adjustment or escalation. |
| Allocation Policy Agent | P1 | Yes | Applies materiality, ownership, and approval controls to allocations. |
| Reporting Evidence Agent | P1 | Yes | Builds evidence packs for reported numbers and commentary. |
| ICFR Control Agent | P1 | Yes | Maps reporting assertions to controls, tests, and exceptions. |
| Narrative Assurance Agent | P1 | Yes | Validates commentary against evidence and variance drivers. |
| Certification Routing Agent | P1 | Yes | Routes reporting signoff and captures accountable approvers. |
| SAP Skill Orchestration Agent | P1 | Yes | Treats SAP Joule/BTP/SAP-native actions as governed runtime skills. |
| BTP Extension Governance Agent | P1 | Yes | Validates extension ownership, data boundary, and control impact. |
| SAP Coexistence Agent | P1 | Yes | Resolves ECC, CFIN, S/4HANA, and PaPM mapping state. |
| SAP Action Control Agent | P1 | Yes | Blocks unsafe SAP write-back and routes controlled execution. |
| Data Readiness Agent | P1 | Yes | Scores finance dataset readiness for continuous finance decisions. |
| Lineage Agent | P1 | Yes | Traces source system, transformation, version, timestamp, and owner. |
| Mapping Completeness Agent | P1 | Yes | Finds missing HDS, OneData, Foundry, SAP, or PaPM mappings. |
| Freshness Guardrail Agent | P1 | Yes | Reduces confidence or blocks action when data is stale. |
| PRA Agent | P1 | Yes | Extracts and reconciles production revenue accounting evidence. |
| Pilot Readiness Agent | P1 | Yes | Scores pilot readiness across data, controls, agents, evidence, and replay. |
| Pilot Evidence Agent | P1 | Yes | Defines pilot proof requirements and builds evidence contracts. |
| Pilot Dependency Agent | P1 | Yes | Finds missing source, owner, integration, and policy dependencies. |
| Pilot Value Agent | P1 | Yes | Links pilot outcomes to close compression, automation, forecast, and control value. |
| Reconciliation Agent | P1 | Yes | Explains breaks, aging, root cause, and owner. |
| Settlement Agent | P1 | Yes | Recommends IC netting, settlement, or adjustment. |
Readiness audit framework
| Area | Question |
|---|
| Data | Do we have realistic data? |
| Ontology | Do concepts exist? |
| Events | Are business events modeled? |
| Policies | Are rules implemented? |
| Evidence | Can recommendations be proven? |
| Replay | Can decisions be replayed? |
| Agent Logic | Is reasoning implemented? |
| Human Workflow | Can users intervene? |
| Integration | Are SOR integrations demonstrated? |
| Controls | Are approvals enforced? |
| Learning | Can agents improve? |
| Observability | Can runtime be monitored? |
Additional enterprise data required
| Domain | Data required |
|---|
| FP&A | Historical forecasts, latest estimates, actuals, variance explanations, driver hierarchies. |
| Continuous Close | Close calendar, close tasks, reconciliation exceptions, journal approvals. |
| Intercompany | IC balances, IC disputes, ownership, settlement history, counterparty mappings. |
| BlackLine | Journal analyzer outputs, matching data, reconciliation data, close status. |
| Daily Actuals | Lighthouse Daily Actuals, UDP datasets, Databricks models, SAP actuals, Treasury balances. |
| PRA / Evidence | Operator statements, PDFs, spreadsheets, production data, SAP records, calculation support. |
| Fixed Assets / AUC | AUC balances, project/WBS data, work orders, technical completion events, asset records, SoX controls. |
| PaPM / Allocations | PaPM formulas, allocation drivers, bill-to-actual records, SAC outputs, receiving entity mappings. |
| Reporting / Workiva | Reported metrics, reporting package data, ICFR controls, approvals, commentary, source actuals. |
| SAP BTP / Joule | SAP skill catalog, BTP extension registry, ECC/CFIN/S4 mappings, PaPM objects, ServiceNow handoffs. |
| Finance Data Readiness | Quantum HDS mappings, Lighthouse Daily Actuals, UDP datasets, Databricks tables, OneData definitions, Foundry mappings. |
| Continuous Accounting Pilots | Drilling cost AGT/GOA, ANZ region, P&L-impact-led, terminal data automation, accrual automation, aviation pilot scope and owners. |
Must-have demonstration scenario · readiness 4.5/5
Continuous Close Command Center
Audience: CFO, Controller, FP&A Lead
Story: Close status moves from unknown until period-end to visible every day.
Close Agent · Accrual Agent · Journal Agent
SAP ECC · SAP S/4HANA · BlackLine
| Demo element | Detail |
|---|
| Demo | Show 92% close readiness, then drill into 3 accrual issues, 2 intercompany mismatches, and 1 journal awaiting approval with evidence, policy, action, impact, and replay. |
| Data required | SAP journal data, BlackLine reconciliations, Close calendar, Close tasks, Approvals |
| Integrations | SAP ECC, SAP S/4HANA, BlackLine, ServiceNow |
| Agents | Close Agent, Accrual Agent, Journal Agent, Policy Agent, Evidence Agent |
Readiness audit
| Area | Score | Question |
|---|
| Data | 4 | Do we have realistic data? |
| Ontology | 5 | Do concepts exist? |
| Events | 4 | Are business events modeled? |
| Policies | 5 | Are rules implemented? |
| Evidence | 5 | Can recommendations be proven? |
| Replay | 5 | Can decisions be replayed? |
| Agent Logic | 4 | Is reasoning implemented? |
| Human Workflow | 4 | Can users intervene? |
| Integration | 4 | Are SOR integrations demonstrated? |
| Controls | 5 | Are approvals enforced? |
| Learning | 4 | Can agents improve? |
| Observability | 5 | Can runtime be monitored? |
Must-have demonstration scenario · readiness 3.7/5
Driver-Based Forecasting
Audience: FP&A Lead, CFO, Business Finance
Story: Business changes production assumptions and the forecast updates with financial impact.
Driver Intelligence Agent · Forecast Agent · Variance Agent
UDP · Databricks · SAP
| Demo element | Detail |
|---|
| Demo | Move Oil Production -5% and immediately show revenue, cash, EBITDA, and margin changes with an explanation drawer. |
| Data required | Production drivers, Volumes, Prices, Historical forecast, Actuals |
| Integrations | UDP, Databricks, SAP, Foundry |
| Agents | Driver Intelligence Agent, Forecast Agent, Variance Agent, Narrative Agent |
Readiness audit
| Area | Score | Question |
|---|
| Data | 3 | Do we have realistic data? |
| Ontology | 4 | Do concepts exist? |
| Events | 4 | Are business events modeled? |
| Policies | 4 | Are rules implemented? |
| Evidence | 4 | Can recommendations be proven? |
| Replay | 4 | Can decisions be replayed? |
| Agent Logic | 4 | Is reasoning implemented? |
| Human Workflow | 3 | Can users intervene? |
| Integration | 3 | Are SOR integrations demonstrated? |
| Controls | 4 | Are approvals enforced? |
| Learning | 3 | Can agents improve? |
| Observability | 4 | Can runtime be monitored? |
Must-have demonstration scenario · readiness 3.9/5
Automated Variance Intelligence
Audience: FP&A Lead, Segment Finance, CFO
Story: Variance explains itself instead of relying on manual commentary assembly.
Variance Agent · Root Cause Agent · Action Agent
SAP · UDP · Databricks
| Demo element | Detail |
|---|
| Demo | Open revenue variance -$120M and show attribution: 60% volume, 25% price, 10% FX, 5% timing, followed by recommended actions. |
| Data required | Actuals, Forecast, Drivers, FX, Commodity prices |
| Integrations | SAP, UDP, Databricks, Market data |
| Agents | Variance Agent, Root Cause Agent, Action Agent, Narrative Agent |
Readiness audit
| Area | Score | Question |
|---|
| Data | 4 | Do we have realistic data? |
| Ontology | 4 | Do concepts exist? |
| Events | 4 | Are business events modeled? |
| Policies | 4 | Are rules implemented? |
| Evidence | 4 | Can recommendations be proven? |
| Replay | 4 | Can decisions be replayed? |
| Agent Logic | 4 | Is reasoning implemented? |
| Human Workflow | 3 | Can users intervene? |
| Integration | 4 | Are SOR integrations demonstrated? |
| Controls | 4 | Are approvals enforced? |
| Learning | 4 | Can agents improve? |
| Observability | 4 | Can runtime be monitored? |
Must-have demonstration scenario · readiness 4.1/5
Real-Time Intercompany Resolution
Audience: Controller, R2R Lead, Project LIBRA Team
Story: Intercompany mismatch is detected, explained, routed, and resolved before close pressure builds.
Intercompany Match Agent · Root Cause Agent · Settlement Agent
SAP · BlackLine · Treasury
| Demo element | Detail |
|---|
| Demo | Show Company A $8.2M payable vs Company B $7.7M receivable; agent identifies timing issue, payment pending, and recommends resolution. |
| Data required | IC balances, IC disputes, Settlement history, Counterparty mappings |
| Integrations | SAP, BlackLine, Treasury |
| Agents | Intercompany Match Agent, Root Cause Agent, Settlement Agent, Evidence Agent |
Readiness audit
| Area | Score | Question |
|---|
| Data | 3 | Do we have realistic data? |
| Ontology | 4 | Do concepts exist? |
| Events | 4 | Are business events modeled? |
| Policies | 4 | Are rules implemented? |
| Evidence | 5 | Can recommendations be proven? |
| Replay | 5 | Can decisions be replayed? |
| Agent Logic | 4 | Is reasoning implemented? |
| Human Workflow | 4 | Can users intervene? |
| Integration | 4 | Are SOR integrations demonstrated? |
| Controls | 5 | Are approvals enforced? |
| Learning | 3 | Can agents improve? |
| Observability | 4 | Can runtime be monitored? |
Must-have demonstration scenario · readiness 4.5/5
Automated Journal Intelligence
Audience: Controller, R2R Lead, Internal Controls
Story: Journal risk is checked against policy, materiality, prior history, SoD, and evidence before approval or escalation.
Journal Intelligence Agent · Policy Agent · Risk Agent
SAP · BlackLine · Microsoft Entra ID
| Demo element | Detail |
|---|
| Demo | Open a journal, show risk score, policy evaluation, BlackLine/SAP state, and approve-or-escalate recommendation. |
| Data required | Journal history, Policies, Approvals, SAP journals, BlackLine journal analyzer outputs |
| Integrations | SAP, BlackLine, Microsoft Entra ID |
| Agents | Journal Intelligence Agent, Policy Agent, Risk Agent, Evidence Agent |
Readiness audit
| Area | Score | Question |
|---|
| Data | 4 | Do we have realistic data? |
| Ontology | 5 | Do concepts exist? |
| Events | 4 | Are business events modeled? |
| Policies | 5 | Are rules implemented? |
| Evidence | 5 | Can recommendations be proven? |
| Replay | 5 | Can decisions be replayed? |
| Agent Logic | 4 | Is reasoning implemented? |
| Human Workflow | 4 | Can users intervene? |
| Integration | 4 | Are SOR integrations demonstrated? |
| Controls | 5 | Are approvals enforced? |
| Learning | 4 | Can agents improve? |
| Observability | 5 | Can runtime be monitored? |
Must-have demonstration scenario · readiness 3.8/5
Daily Actuals / Finance Pulse
Audience: CFO, FP&A Lead, Controller
Story: Current financial position is continuously visible rather than discovered after month-end.
Daily Actuals Agent · Financial Event Agent · Variance Agent
SAP · UDP · Databricks
| Demo element | Detail |
|---|
| Demo | Show today revenue, margin, cash, EBITDA, and forecast drift; ask what changed today and trace source freshness. |
| Data required | Lighthouse daily actuals, UDP datasets, Databricks models, Treasury data, SAP actuals |
| Integrations | SAP, UDP, Databricks, Treasury |
| Agents | Daily Actuals Agent, Financial Event Agent, Variance Agent, Forecast Refresh Agent |
Readiness audit
| Area | Score | Question |
|---|
| Data | 3 | Do we have realistic data? |
| Ontology | 4 | Do concepts exist? |
| Events | 5 | Are business events modeled? |
| Policies | 4 | Are rules implemented? |
| Evidence | 4 | Can recommendations be proven? |
| Replay | 4 | Can decisions be replayed? |
| Agent Logic | 4 | Is reasoning implemented? |
| Human Workflow | 3 | Can users intervene? |
| Integration | 3 | Are SOR integrations demonstrated? |
| Controls | 4 | Are approvals enforced? |
| Learning | 3 | Can agents improve? |
| Observability | 5 | Can runtime be monitored? |
Must-have demonstration scenario · readiness 4.2/5
Continuous Accrual Automation
Audience: Controller, Operations Finance, Internal Controls
Story: Maintenance completed but invoice not received becomes a recommended accrual with evidence and policy.
Accrual Agent · Evidence Agent · Policy Agent
SAP · Ariba · Maintenance systems
| Demo element | Detail |
|---|
| Demo | Show maintenance event, PO/receipt/history evidence, recommended accrual, policy validation, control validation, and SAP/BlackLine action path. |
| Data required | PO, Receipt, Maintenance events, Historical costs, SAP actuals |
| Integrations | SAP, Ariba, Maintenance systems, BlackLine |
| Agents | Accrual Agent, Evidence Agent, Policy Agent, Control Agent |
Readiness audit
| Area | Score | Question |
|---|
| Data | 3 | Do we have realistic data? |
| Ontology | 4 | Do concepts exist? |
| Events | 5 | Are business events modeled? |
| Policies | 5 | Are rules implemented? |
| Evidence | 5 | Can recommendations be proven? |
| Replay | 5 | Can decisions be replayed? |
| Agent Logic | 4 | Is reasoning implemented? |
| Human Workflow | 4 | Can users intervene? |
| Integration | 3 | Are SOR integrations demonstrated? |
| Controls | 5 | Are approvals enforced? |
| Learning | 3 | Can agents improve? |
| Observability | 4 | Can runtime be monitored? |
Must-have demonstration scenario · readiness 3.6/5
PRA Evidence Intelligence
Audience: Upstream Finance, Controller, Audit
Story: PDFs, operator statements, spreadsheets, production data, and SAP records are transformed into evidence-linked reconciled finance decisions.
OCR Agent · Evidence Agent · Reconciliation Agent
SAP · SharePoint/OpenText · Databricks
| Demo element | Detail |
|---|
| Demo | Extract and reconcile PDF/operator statement/spreadsheet/SAP data, then show evidence lineage, confidence, calculation, and replay. |
| Data required | Operator statements, Production data, PDFs, Spreadsheets, SAP records |
| Integrations | SAP, SharePoint/OpenText, Databricks, Evidence Intelligence Runtime |
| Agents | OCR Agent, Evidence Agent, Reconciliation Agent, Calculation Agent, Policy Agent |
Readiness audit
| Area | Score | Question |
|---|
| Data | 2 | Do we have realistic data? |
| Ontology | 3 | Do concepts exist? |
| Events | 3 | Are business events modeled? |
| Policies | 4 | Are rules implemented? |
| Evidence | 5 | Can recommendations be proven? |
| Replay | 5 | Can decisions be replayed? |
| Agent Logic | 3 | Is reasoning implemented? |
| Human Workflow | 4 | Can users intervene? |
| Integration | 3 | Are SOR integrations demonstrated? |
| Controls | 4 | Are approvals enforced? |
| Learning | 3 | Can agents improve? |
| Observability | 4 | Can runtime be monitored? |
Must-have demonstration scenario · readiness 4.1/5
Capitalization and AUC Intelligence
Audience: Controller, Fixed Assets Lead, Project Finance, Internal Controls
Story: Auto-capitalization and AUC decisions become policy-backed, evidence-linked, SoX-aware, and visible before close.
Capitalization Agent · AUC Monitoring Agent · Asset Completion Agent
SAP Asset Accounting · SAP BTP · Project systems
| Demo element | Detail |
|---|
| Demo | Open an AUC project, show technical completion, policy treatment, capitalization evidence, SoX impact, SAP asset path, and replay. |
| Data required | AUC balances, Project/WBS data, Work orders, Technical completion events, Fixed asset policy, SAP asset records |
| Integrations | SAP Asset Accounting, SAP BTP, Project systems, Evidence Intelligence Runtime |
| Agents | Capitalization Agent, AUC Monitoring Agent, Asset Completion Agent, Fixed Asset Policy Agent, SoX Evidence Agent |
Readiness audit
| Area | Score | Question |
|---|
| Data | 3 | Do we have realistic data? |
| Ontology | 4 | Do concepts exist? |
| Events | 4 | Are business events modeled? |
| Policies | 5 | Are rules implemented? |
| Evidence | 5 | Can recommendations be proven? |
| Replay | 5 | Can decisions be replayed? |
| Agent Logic | 4 | Is reasoning implemented? |
| Human Workflow | 4 | Can users intervene? |
| Integration | 3 | Are SOR integrations demonstrated? |
| Controls | 5 | Are approvals enforced? |
| Learning | 3 | Can agents improve? |
| Observability | 4 | Can runtime be monitored? |
Must-have demonstration scenario · readiness 3.6/5
PaPM Allocation and Recharge Automation
Audience: FP&A Lead, Controller, Allocation Process Owner
Story: Allocations and recharges become driver-linked, calculation-lineage-backed, policy-controlled, and replayable.
Allocation Driver Agent · PaPM Lineage Agent · Recharge Variance Agent
SAP PaPM · SAP SAC · SAP
| Demo element | Detail |
|---|
| Demo | Open a bill-to-actual variance, show PaPM formula version, source drivers, recharge recipient, policy threshold, recommended adjustment, and replay. |
| Data required | PaPM allocation outputs, Driver sources, Bill-to-actual records, SAC reports, Receiving entity mappings |
| Integrations | SAP PaPM, SAP SAC, SAP, Databricks, UDP |
| Agents | Allocation Driver Agent, PaPM Lineage Agent, Recharge Variance Agent, Allocation Policy Agent |
Readiness audit
| Area | Score | Question |
|---|
| Data | 2 | Do we have realistic data? |
| Ontology | 4 | Do concepts exist? |
| Events | 3 | Are business events modeled? |
| Policies | 4 | Are rules implemented? |
| Evidence | 4 | Can recommendations be proven? |
| Replay | 5 | Can decisions be replayed? |
| Agent Logic | 3 | Is reasoning implemented? |
| Human Workflow | 4 | Can users intervene? |
| Integration | 3 | Are SOR integrations demonstrated? |
| Controls | 4 | Are approvals enforced? |
| Learning | 3 | Can agents improve? |
| Observability | 4 | Can runtime be monitored? |
Must-have demonstration scenario · readiness 3.9/5
Statutory Reporting Evidence
Audience: Group Reporting, Controller, CFO, Internal Controls
Story: Reported numbers and commentary become evidence-backed, control-mapped, approved, and replayable.
Reporting Evidence Agent · ICFR Control Agent · Narrative Assurance Agent
Workiva · SAP · BlackLine
| Demo element | Detail |
|---|
| Demo | Open a board-pack metric, show source lineage, narrative support, ICFR control, owner certification, Workiva-style evidence package, and replay. |
| Data required | Reported metrics, Workiva/reporting package data, ICFR controls, Approvals, Variance commentary, Source actuals |
| Integrations | Workiva, SAP, BlackLine, UDP, Evidence Intelligence Runtime |
| Agents | Reporting Evidence Agent, ICFR Control Agent, Narrative Assurance Agent, Certification Routing Agent |
Readiness audit
| Area | Score | Question |
|---|
| Data | 2 | Do we have realistic data? |
| Ontology | 4 | Do concepts exist? |
| Events | 3 | Are business events modeled? |
| Policies | 5 | Are rules implemented? |
| Evidence | 5 | Can recommendations be proven? |
| Replay | 5 | Can decisions be replayed? |
| Agent Logic | 3 | Is reasoning implemented? |
| Human Workflow | 5 | Can users intervene? |
| Integration | 3 | Are SOR integrations demonstrated? |
| Controls | 5 | Are approvals enforced? |
| Learning | 3 | Can agents improve? |
| Observability | 4 | Can runtime be monitored? |
Must-have demonstration scenario · readiness 4.2/5
SAP BTP and Joule Coexistence
Audience: SAP Architecture, AI Platform, Security, Finance Technology
Story: SAP-native capabilities participate as governed skills while the runtime coordinates cross-platform policy, evidence, replay, and accountability.
SAP Skill Orchestration Agent · BTP Extension Governance Agent · SAP Coexistence Agent
SAP Joule · SAP BTP · SAP ECC
| Demo element | Detail |
|---|
| Demo | Show a SAP-native validation skill, BTP extension, ECC/CFIN/S4 object mapping, action gateway policy check, optional SAP deep link, and replay. |
| Data required | SAP API/event catalog, BTP extension registry, ECC/CFIN/S4 mappings, PaPM objects, ServiceNow task/posting metadata |
| Integrations | SAP Joule, SAP BTP, SAP ECC, SAP CFIN, SAP S/4HANA, SAP PaPM, ServiceNow |
| Agents | SAP Skill Orchestration Agent, BTP Extension Governance Agent, SAP Coexistence Agent, SAP Action Control Agent |
Readiness audit
| Area | Score | Question |
|---|
| Data | 3 | Do we have realistic data? |
| Ontology | 4 | Do concepts exist? |
| Events | 4 | Are business events modeled? |
| Policies | 5 | Are rules implemented? |
| Evidence | 4 | Can recommendations be proven? |
| Replay | 5 | Can decisions be replayed? |
| Agent Logic | 4 | Is reasoning implemented? |
| Human Workflow | 4 | Can users intervene? |
| Integration | 4 | Are SOR integrations demonstrated? |
| Controls | 5 | Are approvals enforced? |
| Learning | 3 | Can agents improve? |
| Observability | 5 | Can runtime be monitored? |
Must-have demonstration scenario · readiness 4.0/5
Finance Data Readiness
Audience: Data Architecture, FP&A, Quantum/HDS Team, AI Platform
Story: Agents only recommend or execute when finance data freshness, lineage, mapping completeness, and source confidence are explicit.
Data Readiness Agent · Lineage Agent · Mapping Completeness Agent
UDP · Databricks · OneData
| Demo element | Detail |
|---|
| Demo | Open a Daily Actuals data product, show UDP/Databricks source freshness, Quantum HDS mapping, OneData/Foundry semantics, confidence guardrail, and blocked autonomous action for stale data. |
| Data required | Quantum HDS mappings, Lighthouse Daily Actuals, UDP datasets, Databricks tables, OneData definitions, Foundry ontology mappings |
| Integrations | UDP, Databricks, OneData, Foundry, SAP ECC, SAP CFIN, SAP S/4HANA |
| Agents | Data Readiness Agent, Lineage Agent, Mapping Completeness Agent, Freshness Guardrail Agent |
Readiness audit
| Area | Score | Question |
|---|
| Data | 4 | Do we have realistic data? |
| Ontology | 4 | Do concepts exist? |
| Events | 4 | Are business events modeled? |
| Policies | 4 | Are rules implemented? |
| Evidence | 4 | Can recommendations be proven? |
| Replay | 4 | Can decisions be replayed? |
| Agent Logic | 4 | Is reasoning implemented? |
| Human Workflow | 3 | Can users intervene? |
| Integration | 4 | Are SOR integrations demonstrated? |
| Controls | 5 | Are approvals enforced? |
| Learning | 3 | Can agents improve? |
| Observability | 5 | Can runtime be monitored? |
Must-have demonstration scenario · readiness 4.0/5
Continuous Accounting Pilot Tracker
Audience: FP&A Technology, Pilot Owners, Architecture, Controls
Story: The six FP&A pilot themes become inspectable delivery increments mapped to agents, source systems, policies, evidence, owners, readiness, and replay proof.
Pilot Readiness Agent · Pilot Evidence Agent · Pilot Dependency Agent
SAP · BlackLine · SAP PaPM
| Demo element | Detail |
|---|
| Demo | Open the six-pilot tracker, select Accrual Automation or Terminal Data Automation, and show agents, source data, evidence contract, policy gates, readiness score, and replay path. |
| Data required | Pilot scope, Owner mapping, Source-system catalog, Policy controls, Evidence requirements, Readiness scores |
| Integrations | SAP, BlackLine, SAP PaPM, UDP, Databricks, Terminal/operational systems |
| Agents | Pilot Readiness Agent, Pilot Evidence Agent, Pilot Dependency Agent, Pilot Value Agent |
Readiness audit
| Area | Score | Question |
|---|
| Data | 3 | Do we have realistic data? |
| Ontology | 4 | Do concepts exist? |
| Events | 4 | Are business events modeled? |
| Policies | 4 | Are rules implemented? |
| Evidence | 5 | Can recommendations be proven? |
| Replay | 5 | Can decisions be replayed? |
| Agent Logic | 4 | Is reasoning implemented? |
| Human Workflow | 4 | Can users intervene? |
| Integration | 3 | Are SOR integrations demonstrated? |
| Controls | 5 | Are approvals enforced? |
| Learning | 3 | Can agents improve? |
| Observability | 4 | Can runtime be monitored? |