Context Layer Audit Console - IRIS

Completeness, lineage, and usage proof for enterprise context
AuditContext usageDecision gating

Context Layer Audit Console

This console answers the credibility question enterprise reviewers will ask: is enterprise context complete, and is it actually used by agents, policies, evidence, decisions, replay, and the UI? It scores context completeness deterministically and shows the signal-to-outcome trace.

Audited cases
75
Avg completeness
40%
Context usage
26%
Agent bypasses
174
Critical gaps
359
Replayable
18

What this audits

Enterprise context is treated as a governed runtime asset: entities, relationships, policies, evidence, decisions, outcomes, and learning. The page checks whether those assets are present and whether they influence the decision.

Concept coverageRequired entities are present for the case type
Relationship coverageSupplier -> PO -> Invoice -> Receipt -> Payment -> Exception trace
Policy linkagePolicy ID/version linked to decision ledger
Evidence linkageEvidence hash/source refs available for audit
Replay linkageReplay hash available with context version
Agent usageAgents show the context queries and returned objects
Bypass detectionMissing context usage is flagged
Negative simulationMask context and prove the recommendation changes

Why this matters

Without this proof, an Enterprise Context page can look like selected metadata. With it, bp can see that context is complete, auditable, used in decisions, and able to block or degrade actions when key context is missing.

Completeness scoreRequired context present / required context expected
Decision gateMissing policy or evidence can block execution
Usage proofAgent context queries are visible
Lineage traceSignal -> Context -> Policy -> Evidence -> Recommendation -> Outcome
Replay with contextDecision can be reconstructed with exact context hashes
Safe degradationMissing context forces warning, review, or block

Live Context Completeness + Usage Audit

Live runtime

Audited cases
75
Avg completeness
40%
Context usage rate
26%
Agent bypasses
174
Missing critical context
359
Replayable decisions
18
Scoring model
Deterministic
Persistence
persisted

Case completeness map

CaseTypeScoreStatusAssetsPolicy
INV-UDP-CERT-001Invoice22%blocked3/12policy missing
INV-UDP-CERT-001Invoice22%blocked3/12policy missing
INV-UDP-CERT-001Invoice22%blocked3/12policy missing
INV-UDP-CERT-001Invoice22%blocked3/12policy missing
INV-UDP-CERT-001Invoice22%blocked3/12policy missing
INV-UDP-CERT-001Invoice22%blocked3/12policy missing
sphere:finance:invoice:INV-00914invoice22%blocked3/12policy missing
sphere:upstream:well:WELL-104well15%blocked2/12policy missing

Lineage trace · INV-UDP-CERT-001

Business Signalresolved context snapshot
Context Objects LoadedInvoice INV-UDP-CERT-001; 0 source refs
Relationships Loaded0 relationship links captured
Policies AppliedNo policy linked
Evidence Retrieved56f9dbb865e55658e113d324b9279836b7880f2a22004dbcce79b390f38fde65
Agent ReasoningSnapshot resolved without decision narrative
RecommendationNo action linked
OutcomeNo outcome linked
ReplayReplay hash not linked
LearningLearning signal pending

Agent context usage

AgentQueryObjectsUsedImpact
enterprise-context-runtimeInvoice context + policy + evidence0NoResolved context used to create decision/evidence/replay proof.
Policy Agentgoverning policy0NoPolicy missing linked to the decision.
Evidence Agentsource refs and lineage0NoSource lineage supports replay and audit.

Skills + Policy Framework Audit

Skills represent enterprise capabilities. Policies represent enterprise guardrails. The runtime proves that an agent can act only when a skill is authorized by policy, supported by evidence, and governed through replay.

Skill
Hold Duplicate Payment
Authority
recommend + controlled execute
Policy
Policy missing
Authorization
not authorized
Context
Skill Activated: Hold Duplicate Payment (SKILL-P2P-DUP-HOLD)
Policy Evaluation: Policy missing
Evidence Collection
Decision Recommendation: No governed action linked
Human / Agent Action
Replay & Audit
Learning

Skill audit questions

Skill IDSKILL-P2P-DUP-HOLD
Version2026.06
OwnerP2P Control Owner
Risk ClassHigh financial control
PurposePrevent duplicate supplier payment before release.
InputsInvoice, Supplier master, PO, Prior payment, Evidence pack
OutputsHold recommendation, Supplier validation request, Payment release control
PoliciesPolicy missing
Authorityrecommend + controlled execute
Execution Modegoverned action
EvidenceInvoice, Purchase order, Receipt, Prior payment, Supplier history
ExplainabilityReview required
ReplayMissing
LearningPending outcome feedback
Human OverrideAnalyst can hold; supervisor required for release override.

Policy audit questions

SourcePolicy Runtime / authority matrix
OwnerFinance Governance
ScopeInvoice
EnforcementBlocked until policy exists
VersionVersion missing
VersioningVersion missing
Exception HandlingAnalyst can hold; supervisor required for release override.
Evidence RequirementInvoice, Purchase order, Receipt, Prior payment
MonitoringCompliance measured through ledger, usage proof, and replay
AuditabilityReplay missing

Negative context dependency simulation

Simulation masks context in the audit evaluator only. It does not delete source records, evidence, or snapshots.

Run a simulation to prove the recommendation changes when context is missing.

Enterprise positioning

The runtime does not treat context as documents or embeddings. It treats context as governed enterprise assets that every agent decision must prove it used.

Implementation boundary

This first version derives completeness and usage from resolved snapshots and the decision ledger. Persistent agent-context usage records should be added next for production-grade ContextOps.