Spend analytics rows
0
Aggregated spend rows available for source-bound spend insight.
Spend Intelligence
Understand the operating model before opening the live use case.
Spend Intelligence Launch
Refreshed: 2026-07-18 22:54:29 UTC
SOURCE
bp Sphere use case launch spec + linked runtime proof surfaces
Scope: Understand → Experience → Verify
POLICY
Launch metrics are non-attestation unless a section is explicitly marked live
EVIDENCE
Planning system, SAP actuals, Ariba commitments, pending invoices, contracts
RECORDS
Scenario orientation with downstream runtime, evidence, lineage, and read-model links
ACTION
Launch Spend Intelligence
Launch Page Data Basis
T2/T3 MIXED READ MODEL
NON-ATTESTATION
FALLBACK DISCLOSED
The figures on this launch page are validation-orientation values unless a section is explicitly marked live.
They are not audit-attested SOR proof and must not be presented as production financial evidence.
A live compact read-model anchor is shown below for this launch page. Static launch metrics remain orientation-only.
Live Domain Read-Model Anchor
These values come from page-specific persisted read-models where available. Zeros mean no live rows were present, not a substituted demo value.
Total spend
$0
Total spend from persisted spend analytics rows.
Maverick spend items
0
Off-contract spend rows available for leakage analysis.
Maverick spend
$0
Maverick spend amount from persisted items.
Source Connector Readiness Anchor
Connector dependencies are loaded from tenant domain connector manifests for procurement, finance.
This is readiness metadata, not a successful SOR call; live proof still requires read-model rows, evidence, policy, replay, or source-system response records.
Mode distribution: declared: 1, live: 5, local_live: 10.
procurement · default_sor
declared
2 operations: read, write · freshness Not declared
finance · SAP S/4HANA
live
10 operations: get_journal_entries, post_journal_entry, get_gl_balances +7 more · freshness 60
finance · SAP S/4HANA Central Finance
live
5 operations: get_central_journal_entries, get_harmonized_trial_balance, get_replication_status +2 more · freshness 120
finance · SAP Ariba
local_live
6 operations: get_purchase_requisitions, get_purchase_orders, get_invoices +3 more · freshness 300
finance · Coupa
local_live
6 operations: get_invoices, get_purchase_orders, get_requisitions +3 more · freshness 300
finance · BlackLine
live
7 operations: get_reconciliations, get_reconciliation_detail, get_close_tasks +4 more · freshness 120
Live Platform Proof Anchor
These counts come from persisted runtime tables. Business figures elsewhere on this launch page remain non-attestation unless separately marked live.
Agent Executions5826289
Policy Evaluation Logs21474822
Decision Ledger Records5422407
Organizational Change Records7
Value Event Records39489
Business Problem
Why this use case matters before the demo starts
Budget owners often know the budget but not the full combination of actuals, open commitments, pending invoices, and expected future consumption until overspend is already visible.
bp Sphere Decision Operating System
Spend Intelligence
Connect budget, commitments, pending invoices, and projected consumption into governed forecast insight.
Enterprise Signal
Budget variance forecast
This use case starts with a governed enterprise signal, not a generic AI prompt.
→
bp Sphere Assembles
Context + Evidence + Policy + Impact + Judgment + Memory
Source systems consulted: Planning system, SAP actuals, Ariba commitments, pending invoices, contracts. Consequences evaluated: Projected year-end spend, variance drivers, owner alerts, forecast accuracy.
Context Discovery
Evidence Assembly
Policy Evaluation
Impact Analysis
Human Judgment
Decision Memory
What This Use Case Proves
1
Signal
Budget variance forecast enters the operating model.
2
Context Discovery
Planning system, SAP actuals, Ariba commitments, pending invoices, contracts are assembled into enterprise context.
3
Evidence & Policy
Controls and source evidence shape the decision before recommendation.
4
Impact
Projected year-end spend, variance drivers, owner alerts, forecast accuracy are calculated before action.
5
Human Judgment
The operator approves, overrides, escalates, or requests more evidence.
6
Decision Memory
This same model extends from finance planning into procurement, operations, and controller workflows.
Launch Metrics · Non-Attestation Unless Marked Live
Enterprise Context Sources5
Evidence Records Evaluated42
Policies Applied4
Prior Decisions Referenced11
Data BasisLaunch orientation
Why This Is Credible
- Deterministic forecast logic reconciles actuals, commitments, and projected spend
- LLM explains the drivers but does not invent the numbers
- Budget → PO → Invoice → JE → Forecast lineage makes financial impact visible before close
Recommendation Is Not The Product.
The durable value is the governed combination of context + evidence + policy + impact + human judgment. The recommendation is merely the visible output.
The durable value is the governed combination of context + evidence + policy + impact + human judgment. The recommendation is merely the visible output.
What The Operator Needs To Answer
- What is the projected year-end spend and variance now?
- Which suppliers, projects, or assets are driving the forecast change?
- How do budget, PO, invoice, and JE lineage change the forecast before close?
Enterprise Context Consulted
Planning SystemBudget, current forecast, and latest outlook
SAPActual posted spend, cost centers, internal orders, WBS
AribaOpen POs and commitment posture
Invoice SystemsPending and approved invoice inflow
ContractsMilestones, minimum commitments, and future obligations
How This Use Case Lands In The Room
What the user sees
Budget health, YE projection, variance drivers, and owner alerts
What the system proves
Forecast math stays deterministic while LLM explains the drivers
Human judgment
Finance leaders can intervene before spending is finalized
Why it matters
This connects planning, procurement, operations, and finance into one surface
Evidence Intelligence Fabric
Evidence Discovery Service
Discover candidate evidence across enterprise systems.
Evidence Resolution Service
Resolve authoritative records, versions, and governing precedence.
Evidence Extraction Service
Extract clauses, approvals, milestones, tolerances, and decision-ready snippets.
Evidence Lineage Service
Build cross-system provenance from source records to recommendation.
Evidence Pack Service
Package immutable decision-specific bundles for replay and audit.
Evidence Viewer
Render contracts, emails, invoices, policies, and supporting records with source proof.
Controlled Truth Sources
Planning SystemSAP ActualsAriba CommitmentsPending Invoice QueueContract ObligationsPO ArchiveGoods Receipt RecordsPayment RecordsSupplier Master & RiskPrior Forecast Decisions
Policies Evaluated
Forecast Integrity PolicyBudget Variance Escalation PolicyCommitment Inclusion PolicyProcurement Approval PolicyDelegation & SoD Policy
Evidence Discovery Timeline
07:14:01 · Budget plan loaded
Budget owner, cost center, and approved plan loaded from planning system.
07:14:03 · Actuals synchronized
Posted spend and current cost-center actuals loaded from SAP.
07:14:05 · Commitments and pending invoices linked
Open PO commitments and pending invoices assembled from Ariba and AP inflow.
07:14:07 · Contract obligations resolved
Known milestones and minimum commitments attached to the forecast.
07:14:09 · Deterministic forecast and policy posture applied
Projection and variance thresholds calculated before explanation.
07:14:10 · Recommendation generated
Budget owner alert issued for projected overspend.
Validation Credibility Story
Business problem · before the demo starts
Budget owners often know the budget but not the full combination of actuals, open commitments, pending invoices, and expected future consumption until overspend is already visible.
Why the forecast changed · additive proof
Current actuals +$8.1M · open PO commitments +$2.3M · pending invoices +$1.1M · planned spend +$2.0M · savings -$0.5M · total forecast $14.6M.
Explain this number · evidence pack pattern
Forecast spend is traced to Planning Hub budget, 182 contracts, 4,281 open POs, 1,942 pending invoices, 873 unbilled receipts, last-12-month payments, deterministic projection v2.1, and 94% confidence.
Decision drivers · where leaders should act
Budget risk, commitment risk, supplier concentration, contract leakage, and policy exceptions are shown as intervention points, not passive dashboard metrics.
Organizational Context
Business unit · Refining & Products
Spend cluster is tied to the refining operations tower.
Function · Maintenance Procurement
Operational and procurement ownership are both explicit.
Cost center · CC-REF-221
Budget, PO, invoice, and payment lineage resolves to the same center.
Profit center · PC-RP-44
Impacted margin and business-unit posture are known.
Legal entity · BP Products North Sea Ltd
Legal entity and regional procurement scope are controlled.
Region · North Sea / UK
Regional sourcing and supplier-risk posture apply.
Business owner · Refining Ops Director
Operational owner is tied to the spend outcome.
Budget owner · Regional Maintenance Controller
Forecast accountability is explicit.
Procurement owner · Category Lead - Maintenance Services
Negotiation and sourcing action ownership is clear.
Contract owner · Regional Procurement Manager
Contract renewal and compliance posture are governed.
Real-Time Spend Visibility
Enterprise spend · $1.42B
Enterprise-wide view across supplier, category, and BU posture.
Business-unit spend · $182M
Refining & Products current-year spend in the highlighted scope.
Category spend · $44M
Maintenance services and associated materials cluster.
Supplier spend · $18.9M
Top supplier concentration in the current variance cluster.
Project spend · $12.4M
Project-linked maintenance and turnaround commitments.
Drill-Down Capability
Enterprise -> Business UnitBusiness Unit -> CategoryCategory -> SupplierSupplier -> Transaction
Current / Committed / Accrued / Forecast
Current spend · $8.1M
Posted actuals.
Committed spend · $2.3M
Open PO obligations.
Accrued spend · $1.1M
Expected accrual and pending receipt posture.
Forecast spend · $14.6M
Deterministic projection at year end.
Contract Intelligence
Spend linked to contract · 92%
Most highlighted spend is tied to a governed contract or SOW.
Off-contract spend · $1.2M
Maverick or non-contracted spend was identified for review.
Expired contract usage · 2 supplier lanes
Services are still being bought under expiring or expired terms.
Savings commitments · $2.4M at risk
Negotiated savings are leaking through contract-rate drift and fragmented demand.
Renewal intelligence · 3 renewal / renegotiation opportunities
Upcoming expiration windows create negotiation leverage.
Supplier Intelligence
Supplier concentration · Top 3 suppliers = 41%
High dependency on a small supplier set in the category.
Supplier performance · 2 underperforming suppliers
Service and invoice posture deteriorated in the current quarter.
Supplier risk · 1 sanctions-adjacent, 2 operational risk
Risk posture is linked directly into spend prioritization.
Supplier opportunities · Consolidate 4 fragmented lanes
Rationalization and negotiation opportunities are visible.
Spend Anomaly Detection
Duplicate invoices · 3 detected
Duplicate-risk transactions are already linked to the spend trail.
Price variances · $640K
Rate drift versus contracted posture is visible.
Maverick spend · $1.2M
Unauthorized or off-contract spend was identified.
Split purchases · 5 patterns
Approval-threshold avoidance signals detected.
Budget Intelligence
Budget utilization · 87%
Spend is approaching the control threshold early in the year.
Budget overrun risk · High
Current burn and commitments point to overspend without intervention.
Savings forecast · $2.1M
Negotiation and demand actions can still improve the year-end outlook.
Budget pressure forecast · M+2 escalation window
Without action, pressure hardens before the next formal review cycle.
Savings Intelligence
Negotiation opportunity · $1.3M
Rate and volume posture support immediate supplier negotiations.
Supplier consolidation · $0.6M
Fragmented lanes can be rationalized into fewer suppliers.
Demand reduction · $0.4M
Operational demand shaping is available for low-value consumption.
Savings leakage · $0.5M
Previously negotiated savings are not fully realized.
Policy Intelligence
Approval policy · 2 bypass risks
Threshold and approval-bypass behavior was detected.
Delegation & SoD · 1 potential violation
Approval and requester separation needs review.
Procurement policy · Off-contract exceptions
Maverick spend and split purchase patterns are visible.
Corrective actions · Escalate, source, or freeze
Policy rationale is explicit with next-step guidance.
Predictive Spend Intelligence
Spend forecast · $14.6M YE
Forecast is deterministic and evidence-backed.
Supplier forecast risk · Top supplier concentration risk
Concentration increases resilience and pricing risk.
Contract risk · 3 expiring contracts
Renewal posture threatens cost and compliance if ignored.
Demand management · 2 discretionary lanes to suppress
Demand actions reduce forecast pressure.
Audit Readiness
Spend audit package · Budget -> Contract -> PO -> Invoice -> Payment
End-to-end evidence package is reconstructable.
Compliance package · Approval and policy lineage
Financial controls and procurement compliance are exportable.
Traceability · Source-backed spend insight
Every savings or risk recommendation ties back to original records.
Human-in-the-Loop
Actions · Investigate anomaly · Approve exception · Launch sourcing event · Trigger supplier review · Escalate issue
Procurement and finance leaders stay in control.
Learning loop · Outcomes and savings captured
Recommendation, savings, and exception outcomes feed continuous optimization.
Named Agent Inventory
spend layer
Spend Intelligence Agent · Evidence Discovery Agent · Budget Intelligence Agent
commercial layer
Contract Intelligence Agent · Supplier Intelligence Agent · Savings Intelligence Agent
governance layer
Policy Intelligence Agent · Assurance Agent
Runtime Operations
Enterprise spend visibleCategory spend visibleSupplier spend visibleSavings opportunities visibleRisk alerts visible
Budget alertsContract alertsSupplier risk alertsSpend anomaly alerts
Missing evidence alertsData quality alertsSource system outages handledHuman takeover supported
Runtime Proof Links
Evidence artifact
Open the evidence pack and lineage before treating any recommendation as source-backed.
Policy and replay artifact
Policy and replay claims must resolve to a platform surface, not just launch-page narrative text.
Value claim boundary
Protected, pending, and realized value stay separate. Realized value requires finance attestation.
Evidence Pack Viewer
Budget · BUD-CC-221
99% · Planning System
Version: Latest approved outlook
Retrieved: 07:14:01
Governing status: Anchor
Budget line and current forecast for Cost Center CC-REF-221.
Version: Latest approved outlook
Retrieved: 07:14:01
Governing status: Anchor
Budget line and current forecast for Cost Center CC-REF-221.
Actuals · ACT-CC-221
98% · SAP S/4HANA
Version: Current actual snapshot
Retrieved: 07:14:03
Governing status: Authoritative
Actual spend at Month 7 is $8.1M against the $12.0M annual budget.
Version: Current actual snapshot
Retrieved: 07:14:03
Governing status: Authoritative
Actual spend at Month 7 is $8.1M against the $12.0M annual budget.
Purchase Orders · PO-CC-221
97% · PO Archive
Version: Open PO portfolio
Retrieved: 07:14:04
Governing status: Supporting
Open PO portfolio links supplier commitments to the same cost-center and project budget envelope.
Version: Open PO portfolio
Retrieved: 07:14:04
Governing status: Supporting
Open PO portfolio links supplier commitments to the same cost-center and project budget envelope.
Commitments · COM-CC-221
97% · Ariba
Version: Open commitments
Retrieved: 07:14:05
Governing status: Supporting
Open PO commitments total $2.3M with pending invoices at $1.4M.
Version: Open commitments
Retrieved: 07:14:05
Governing status: Supporting
Open PO commitments total $2.3M with pending invoices at $1.4M.
Goods Receipts · GR-CC-221
95% · Goods Receipt Records
Version: Received services snapshot
Retrieved: 07:14:05
Governing status: Supporting
Goods receipt and service acceptance records confirm which commitments have already landed operationally.
Version: Received services snapshot
Retrieved: 07:14:05
Governing status: Supporting
Goods receipt and service acceptance records confirm which commitments have already landed operationally.
Payment History · PAY-CC-221
96% · Payment Records
Version: Current payment ledger
Retrieved: 07:14:06
Governing status: Supporting
Paid, pending, and duplicate-risk payments were compared against the same spend trail.
Version: Current payment ledger
Retrieved: 07:14:06
Governing status: Supporting
Paid, pending, and duplicate-risk payments were compared against the same spend trail.
Contract Obligations · OBL-CC-221
93% · Contract Repository
Version: Milestone set
Retrieved: 07:14:07
Governing status: Supporting
Known milestone payments and minimum commitments add future spend pressure.
Version: Milestone set
Retrieved: 07:14:07
Governing status: Supporting
Known milestone payments and minimum commitments add future spend pressure.
Supplier Risk · SUP-RISK-221
92% · Supplier Master & Risk
Version: Current risk posture
Retrieved: 07:14:08
Governing status: Supporting
Supplier concentration, dependency, and sanctions posture were linked to the top spend cluster.
Version: Current risk posture
Retrieved: 07:14:08
Governing status: Supporting
Supplier concentration, dependency, and sanctions posture were linked to the top spend cluster.
Policy · FPA-FORECAST-018
97% · Policy Library
Version: Controlled current copy
Retrieved: 07:14:09
Governing status: Authoritative
Forecast must include actuals, commitments, pending invoices, and known contractual obligations.
Version: Controlled current copy
Retrieved: 07:14:09
Governing status: Authoritative
Forecast must include actuals, commitments, pending invoices, and known contractual obligations.
Evidence Lineage
→
Recommendation
bp Sphere · Issue budget owner alert for projected overspend.
→
Budget
Planning System · Approved annual budget and current outlook.
→
Actuals
SAP S/4HANA · Current posted spend.
→
Commitments
Ariba · Open PO and pending invoice posture.
→
Contract Obligations
Contract Repository · Known milestone and minimum commitment pressure.
→
Forecast
Planning Hub · Projected year-end spend calculated from actuals, commitments, pending invoices, and known obligations.
→
Supplier Risk
Supplier Master & Risk · Supplier concentration, risk, and negotiation posture.
Validation Script
Step 1 · Open the launch page
Click: /ui/use-case-launch?case=spend_intelligence
Step 2 · Review the story before launching
Click: Stay on the launch page and point to Spend Visibility, Contract Intelligence, Supplier Intelligence, and Savings Intelligence
Step 3 · Launch the live workspace
Click: Launch Spend Intelligence
Spend Intelligence demonstrates the operating model before you enter the live workspace.