Context Studio
Fast context operating view for bp source systems, finance objects, event catalogs, evidence contracts, policy bindings, and agent-ready business meaning. Formerly CREST Context Studio.
Context Operating System Experience
| Coverage dimension | Measured scope | Score | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Object coverage | Supplier, invoice, PO, payment, journal, policy, control, asset | 92% | Business steward |
| Relationship coverage | Supplier -> contract -> PO -> invoice -> payment links | 87% | Ontology steward |
| Event coverage | Invoice blocked, journal posted, payment released, forecast moved | 84% | Event steward |
| Policy coverage | Authority, SoD, tolerance, evidence, and write-back rules | 91% | Control owner |
| Evidence coverage | Source records, documents, lineage, hashes, and replay pointers | 89% | Evidence steward |
| Decision coverage | Named decision types with owner, alternatives, outcome, and replay | 78% | Decision owner |
| Confidence component | Rule | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Freshness | Critical sources refreshed inside SLA | 22% |
| Completeness | Required fields and relationships present | 24% |
| Source agreement | SAP, Ariba, Databricks, and document evidence do not conflict | 20% |
| Lineage | Source system, timestamp, owner, hash, and replay path attached | 18% |
| Evidence quality | Evidence pack is complete, readable, and policy-aligned | 16% |
| Finding | ContextOps issue | Action | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTX-FIN-041 | Duplicate supplier relationship detected | Assign steward | Procurement data steward | Open |
| CTX-FIN-052 | Invoice-to-PO relationship confidence improved to 94% | Approve finding | P2P control owner | Ready |
| CTX-FIN-063 | Conflicting payment term from SAP and contract extract | Reject finding | ContextOps analyst | Blocked |
| CTX-FIN-074 | Finance Core Pack v1.4 passed coverage gate | Promote context pack | Context council | Ready |
| CTX-FIN-085 | Supplier risk node breached freshness SLA | Mark stale | Supplier master owner | Aging |
| Decision mining signal | Pattern | Operational use |
|---|---|---|
| Most common approval path | Analyst -> Supervisor -> Controller | 37% of high-value P2P holds |
| Most common hold reason | Missing receipt or duplicate candidate | 42% of open exceptions |
| Override hotspot | Payment timing overrides | 9 overrides in last 30 days |
| Reusable pattern | Supplier resubmission after delayed acknowledgement | Promote after 3 more replay-confirmed outcomes |
| Policy friction | FIN-P2P-DUP-04 causes repeat supervisor review | Candidate for threshold simulation |
Runtime Loaded Context Packs
| Status | Objects | Relationships | Events | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| live | 580 | 272 | 393 | 241 |
Loaded objects
asset_lifecycle.asset, Asset, asset_lifecycle.equipment, Equipment, Failuremode, asset_lifecycle.failuremode, Inspection, asset_lifecycle.inspection
Loaded relationships
asset_lifecycle.asset__relates_to__asset_lifecycle.equipment, carbon_sustainability.emissionsource__relates_to__carbon_sustainability.emissionevent, downstream.refinery__contains__downstream.refinery_unit, downstream.refinery__processes__downstream.crude, downstream.refinery_unit__produces__downstream.product, downstream.product__transported_via__downstream.pipeline, downstream.pipeline__delivers_to__downstream.terminal, downstream.terminal__stores__downstream.storage_tank
Loaded events
equipment_health_drop, sensor_threshold_breach, failure_pattern_detected, vibration_threshold_breach, inspection_due, compliance_window_at_risk, work_order_backlog_growth, critical_asset_work_order_open
Source of truth
OntologyFabric domain contract. This prevents the registry from drifting from what the runtime actually loaded.
Show enterprise context assets: objects, relationships, policies, events, decisions, evidence.
Open Supplier -> Contract -> PO -> Invoice -> Payment -> Decision path.
Show whether the context slice is complete enough for governed decisions.
Explain freshness, completeness, source agreement, lineage, and evidence quality.
Operate findings through assign, approve, reject, promote, and stale-state actions.
Prove the decision used the context package and show what changed afterward.
Latest Runtime Capability Update
This page is evaluated against the current runtime baseline: governed chat, WIIF assistant portability, Token Economy controls, fail-closed policy enforcement, deterministic replay, signed evidence, runtime adoption audit, skill learning promotion, autonomy demotion enforcement, case-state propagation, and observability readiness.
Minimum viable context
Start with one bounded slice instead of waiting for a full enterprise ontology.
Platform surfaces
The operating entrypoint links the Canonical Registry, Context Graph, Decision Records, Evidence Vault, ContextOps Center, and Context Engineering Brief into one context operating view.
ContextOps actions
Stewards can assign findings, approve discovered context, reject weak context, promote certified packs, and mark stale nodes before agents consume them.
Decision mining
Replay and decision memory expose common approval paths, exception reasons, override hotspots, reusable patterns, and policy friction.
Finance dimensions
Business unit, legal entity, cost center, profit center, account, supplier, counterparty, asset, project.
Source access
Context can come directly from SAP/Ariba APIs or from curated Databricks products depending on bp readiness.
Agent consumption
Agents receive resolved business objects, not raw tables.